The concept of Intersectionality was born from a need to identify that while all black people suffer discrimination and all women suffer discrimination, black womens’ lived experience due to other structure bias, exacerbates the effects of this discrimination. (Crenshaw, 1990). Structural and personal bias affects anyone whose intersectionality make them vulnerable to discrimination by the patriarchy; be it race, class, ethnicity, gender, age, disability, sexual preference, but in this blog I argue that racism has been problematised and not tackled as distinct from other forms of inequality.
The latest figures in the most recent UAL EDI report reveal the percentage of B.A.M.E staff is 25.5% (8% percent higher than the educational section benchmark). What does this really mean in terms of representation? Is it evidence that racial bias is being tackled through employment practices? After all BAME is a controversial term. It covers a broad church.
One of the most impactful anti-racism training sessions I have ever attended was in 1986 when I first moved to London from Northern Ireland. I was working in an Adult Education Advice Centre. We were a small team of 6, all women and I was the only white woman. These women were from Caribbean and East African dissent. The trainer was a Pakistani man. A key reveal for me was when in response to the question; are you comfortable to describe yourself as an Ethnic Minority? I was the only participant who said yes. It was pointed out to me that I could be British until I opened my mouth, but the others would always be defined by their colour and classed as a minority whether they were British born or not. Racism is based more on colour than nationality.
I was reminded of this when Diane Abbot was accused of racism when she suggested in an interview in the Observer that many white people, with points of difference, experience prejudice but do not experience day to day racism (BBC news). Why did this statement cause such controversy? Why is racism still so embedded in western culture? Why is talking about the direct impact of racism more problematic than talking about inequality and inclusion?
Two research papers that examine the shifting manifestations of racism question how far public discourse on the subject has dealt with the effects of racism. Sambaraju & McVittie looking at racism from a social psychology perspective posit the view that there has been a public suppression of racism (2021, P.4). The paper cites examples where campaigns to make racism explicit meet with negative responses that are framed in terms of egalitarian concerns rather than prejudicial motives. One such example cited in this paper is All lives Matter, (West et al, 2012). Supporters of this movement view themselves as being more inclusive than Black Lives Matter but they are explicitly downplaying the role of racism in the killing of George Floyd that led to the creation of this movement, (2021, P.7).
Lin highlights the use of critical race theory (CRT) to identify racist inequalities and bias in the design and delivery of some academic subjects. However, her paper highlights incidences where ‘colourblind ideology’ has denied the existence of racism in health studies, computer science, sports, business and religion (2022, P. 1086). If a problem is not visible it is easier to ignore and harder to speak out against. Anti-racism needs to be explicitly about race not just diversity when considering inclusive policy, pedagogy and our own practice.
BBC (April 23, 2023) Diane Abbott suspended as Labour MP after racism letter available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk › news (Accessed 30th May)
Crenshaw, K. (1990) Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color https://moodle.arts.ac.uk/pluginfile.php/2020062/mod_folder/content/0/Crenshaw%201990%20Intersectionality.pdf?forcedownload=1 (Accessed 25th April)
Lin J.P.C. (2022) Exposing the chameleon-like nature of racism: a multidisciplinary (available at https://www.researchgate.net › publication Accessed 2nd June)
Sambaraju, R. & McVitte, C. (2021) Mobilizing race and racism: visible race and invisible racism (Accessed 5th June)
UAL EDI annual report (2024) Available in: https://www.arts.ac.uk/about-ual/public-information/equality-objectives-and-reports (Accessed 30th June)
